On Monday December 6th and Tuesday December 7th, Irène was in Tietola school.
- programme of the visit
- Structural cooperative structure Jigsaw: general procedure - specific description
- Structural cooperative structure Three-step interview
- Content Jigsaw structure: comparison educational system in Finland and Flanders-Belgium: worksheet
Source: Key data on education
CoNetCom: Cooperative learning networks for competence management @ school
The project is a school development project. The overall aim of the project is to enhance the potential of a school as a ‘learning organisation’ and to increase the number of ‘change agents’ in the school.
‘Good practices’ of co-operative learning techniques, which can be used at school during consultation meetings of collegial teaching and non-teaching teams, task forces and ad hoc decision-making groups will be demonstrated and/or experienced hands-on.
‘Good practices’ of co-operative learning techniques, which can be used at school during consultation meetings of collegial teaching and non-teaching teams, task forces and ad hoc decision-making groups will be demonstrated and/or experienced hands-on.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
PROJECT MEETING in Madrid, Spain from Nov 12 till Nov 16th 2009
-> PARTICIPANTS AND FORMAL PROGRAMME
-> STRUCTURAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES: DESCRIPTION
1. Find someone who
2. Rally table
3. Pairs Compare
4. On Tour/Poster Carousel
5. Carousel Feedback
6. Line-Up
7. Academic Controversy
-> STRUCTURAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES: WORKSHEETS for concrete project activities during the meeting
1. Introduction of the participants: Find someone who: chart
2. Processing information:
2.1. T-chart: Info about the Cooperative school (prep reading text)
2.2. Pairs Compare: blank template
2.3. SWOT-analysis: Info about the Italian cooperative learning experience
3. Presenting information/outcomes:
3.1. Cooperative learning slogan:
- Belgium
- Finland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Norway + Turkey
3.2. Cooperative learning - conceptualization:
- group 1 - group 2 - group 3 - group 4
3.3. Project development in the schools: T-chart
4. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IN THE PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS: MONITORING
4.1. Application form: objectives - activity planning - active involvement of staff
4.2. Support documents for evaluation - Source: MICE-T:
- School policy
- Whole school involvement
- Project visibility and products
4.3. Project development in the participating schools: state of affairs
- Belgium: overview of initiatives for embedding the project in the school
- concrete example of using SCL on staff level - photos of this 'staff' learning experience
- Finland Järvenpää - Finland Valkeakoski - Italy -
Latvia - Norway - Spain - Turkey
5. CONCRETE PLANS FOR STRUCTURAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCES
5.1. Coordinating school Belgium: DRAFT Pedagogical staff training day: aims and content / SCL-procedures
5.2. partnerschools: Finland Järvenpää - Finland Valkeakoski - Italy - Latvia - Norway - Spain - Turkey
6. EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT MEETING
6.1. Method Bullseye: (blank template) - activities on Friday
6.2. Learning story: T-chart - Belgium - Finland Järvenpää - Finland Valkeakoski - Italy - Latvia - Norway - Spain - Turkey
-> STRUCTURAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES: DESCRIPTION
1. Find someone who
2. Rally table
3. Pairs Compare
4. On Tour/Poster Carousel
5. Carousel Feedback
6. Line-Up
7. Academic Controversy
-> STRUCTURAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES: WORKSHEETS for concrete project activities during the meeting
1. Introduction of the participants: Find someone who: chart
2. Processing information:
2.1. T-chart: Info about the Cooperative school (prep reading text)
2.2. Pairs Compare: blank template
2.3. SWOT-analysis: Info about the Italian cooperative learning experience
3. Presenting information/outcomes:
3.1. Cooperative learning slogan:
- Belgium
- Finland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Norway + Turkey
3.2. Cooperative learning - conceptualization:
- group 1 - group 2 - group 3 - group 4
3.3. Project development in the schools: T-chart
4. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IN THE PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS: MONITORING
4.1. Application form: objectives - activity planning - active involvement of staff
4.2. Support documents for evaluation - Source: MICE-T:
- School policy
- Whole school involvement
- Project visibility and products
4.3. Project development in the participating schools: state of affairs
- Belgium: overview of initiatives for embedding the project in the school
- concrete example of using SCL on staff level - photos of this 'staff' learning experience
- Finland Järvenpää - Finland Valkeakoski - Italy -
Latvia - Norway - Spain - Turkey
5. CONCRETE PLANS FOR STRUCTURAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCES
5.1. Coordinating school Belgium: DRAFT Pedagogical staff training day: aims and content / SCL-procedures
5.2. partnerschools: Finland Järvenpää - Finland Valkeakoski - Italy - Latvia - Norway - Spain - Turkey
6. EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT MEETING
6.1. Method Bullseye: (blank template) - activities on Friday
6.2. Learning story: T-chart - Belgium - Finland Järvenpää - Finland Valkeakoski - Italy - Latvia - Norway - Spain - Turkey
Monday, November 2, 2009
Dissemination activity Comenius project - coordinating school
EPOS Vlaanderen organized a monitoring day for Comenius schools in Alden Biesen on October 21st. We presented the procedures of our multilateral project CoNetCom thus far.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Prep reflections: How does the school organization enhance working in a cooperative way?
Organizational charts of the participating schools: Italy - Turkey - Spain - Latvia - Finland Järvenpään Lukio - Finland Tietola School - Norway
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Prep work Comenius seminar in Spain - November 2009
- Example Communication plan 2009-2010 Coordinating school
- Example Organizational chart Coordinating school
- Information about 'The Cooperative School' by Johnson D.W. & Johnson R.T.
- Example Organizational chart Coordinating school
- Information about 'The Cooperative School' by Johnson D.W. & Johnson R.T.
Prep visit in Italian partnerschool - Istituto de Fillippo - Villanova di Guidonia in October 2008
You can find the following documents used during the prep visit
- here: the participants and the programme of the visit
- here: the description of the structural cooperative method 'JIGSAW' or 'CLIM'
- here: the QaS-website materials we used to get informed about procedures for a successful project
- Here are the presentations of the partnerschools' contexts: Belgium - Spain - Italy - Turkey - Latvia - Finland Järvenpään Lukio - Finland Tietola School - Norway
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)